SITE INFORMATION / EN
Disclaimer and research limits
Open-source research is useful when it shows its evidence and its uncertainty. It becomes misleading when a partial match is converted into a green badge, a red badge or a legal conclusion.
AT A GLANCE
Before the detail
- A registry match does not automatically prove that a website is official or safe.
- No warning found is not the same as approval by a regulator.
- A working domain does not establish who controls it.
- Guides and consultations are not financial, legal or investment advice.
01 / NOTE
OSINT uses public information; it does not reveal every fact
The research process relies on information that can lawfully be reached from public sources: registers, warnings, legal pages, domains, official publications and public statements. Relevant facts may be private, newly changed or unavailable to the project.
A responsible result therefore records what was found, when it was checked and what remains uncertain. Missing information is not filled with invented facts.
02 / NOTE
No automatic “safe”, “reliable” or “scam” verdict
Similar names can belong to different entities. A real company may have no relationship to the domain using its name. A website can quote genuine details belonging to someone else. Conversely, absence from one warning list does not prove misconduct.
Categorical terms should only be used when a competent primary source actually supports them, and the source should be attributed clearly.
03 / NOTE
Registers and authorisations have a defined scope
A company register may establish corporate existence and identifiers. A supervisory register may show an authorisation and the activity covered by it. Neither automatically proves that a particular web domain is operated by that registered entity.
The useful research questions are narrower: which legal person, which service, which domain, which date and which source connects them?
04 / NOTE
Domain checks have their own limits
A live website does not prove substantive ownership. Content and contacts can change, pages can be copied, domains can be transferred and legitimate organisations can use more than one domain.
The site therefore treats domain availability, claimed identity, legal entity and authorisation as separate facts until a reliable source connects them.
05 / NOTE
If money has already been sent
The “already paid” section does not determine that fraud took place and is not a recovery service. It focuses on low-risk actions: stop rushed additional payments, preserve records, secure accounts and ask the relevant bank or payment provider what procedures may apply.
No page guarantees a chargeback, recall, refund or outcome from a report to an authority.
06 / NOTE
Third-party names, brands and public people
Names are used descriptively as research subjects. Their appearance does not state affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement.
Where a search term is a person’s name, an identical name is not enough to connect that person to a platform. Research should remain tied to public-interest facts and reliable sources rather than speculation about private life.
07 / NOTE
No professional advice
The site does not provide personalised investment recommendations, legal advice, tax advice or banking advice. Important financial or legal decisions may require an appropriately authorised professional or official body.
The free consultation stays within the same educational boundary: it can help read sources and organise questions, but it cannot make the decision for the reader.
08 / NOTE
Dates matter
A check is a snapshot. Registers, websites and warnings can change after the date they were consulted. Re-open the original source before a material decision and note the date and URL.
If a guide is updated, the current website version replaces the earlier wording; screenshots or copies elsewhere may refer to an older version.